tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-73296993783561225272024-03-20T15:10:22.262+00:00ClimategateGlobal Warming Inc - the new global tax system for fresh air.
Hearth Tax 1662-1689,Window Tax 1696-1851,Carbon Dioxide Tax 2005-?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4887125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-76921560825249129812023-12-11T10:43:00.000+00:002023-12-11T10:43:08.592+00:00Climate Change Is Not Threatening Human Health<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/12/climate_change_is_not_threatening_human_health.html" target="_blank"> Linnea Lueken</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">"It has become all too common in the media, especially every time another United Nations climate conference like COP28 takes place, to blame every problem on climate change. The media and their go-to climate pundits reach far and wide to connect whatever tragic event is trending in the news to the modest warming of the past hundred or so years, and they do it no matter how tenuous the connection.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Some claims immediately stand out as ridiculous to even the casual observer, like the claim that the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jul/27/scientists-july-world-hottest-month-record-climate-temperatures" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">oceans are boiling</a>, which is so stupid only someone who has blind trust in favored authorities bordering on pathological would believe it.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Other claims have the appearance of plausibility, at least at first glance, because the logic is relatively straightforward. Even then, existing data often contradicts the climate attribution. Taking a hypothesis, testing it, and then revising it based on the results used to be a thing called the “scientific method,” but apparently many in the media find that too boring and choose to spread unverified claims instead. ........<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Creating climate anxiety is </span><em style="font-size: inherit !important;">explicitly the goal</em><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> of media climate reporting. Bombarding their audiences with scare stories, facts to the contrary be damned, is aimed at motivating people into “taking action” and supporting severe restrictions on fossil-fuel use. Survivors of a natural disaster may also struggle with PTSD or similar ailments, but it </span><a href="https://climaterealism.com/2023/01/wrong-mainstream-media-climate-change-is-not-causing-ptsd/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;" target="_blank">doesn’t mean</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> that climate change is the cause. VOA reporting that climate anxiety is a result of climate change itself is frankly disgusting.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">In the end, objective scientific data does not show that human health is being negatively impacted by climate change, and it is certainly not the biggest health threat facing humanity.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">It is also worth noting how suspicious it is that the WHO is jumping on the climate change alarm train, given their preference for parroting the Chinese Communist Party’s talking points. China also happens to have a near monopoly on “green” tech manufacturing, and stands to gain a lot from the West’s “transition.” I’d argue that the greatest human health threat is actually climate policy, because it is <a href="https://climaterealism.com/2022/10/true-wsj-hurricanes-are-not-becoming-more-damaging-climate-policy-is/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;" target="_blank">destabilizing the electric power grid</a>, increasing <a href="https://climaterealism.com/2023/03/true-daily-signal-climate-change-policy-harms-farmers-and-food-prices/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;" target="_blank">food insecurity</a>, and encouraging the world’s people to be increasingly reliant on the good will of the Chinese Communist Party. Climate change itself doesn’t even break the top 10 of humanitarian or health threats facing the world."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-36974232157334614012023-12-11T10:38:00.000+00:002023-12-11T10:38:05.832+00:00Climate and COVID – Making It Up As They Go Along<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/12/climate_and_covid__making_it_up_as_they_go_along.html" target="_blank"> Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">"Were COVID public health recommendations on masks, vaccines, and distancing about the medical science or the political science?</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Now pivot to climate change, formerly known as global warming.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">No scientist will argue that the climate is not changing. The planet has gone through numerous ice ages, large and small, obvious evidence of a changing climate. The disagreement is over what is causing that change. .....<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Planet Earth has experienced ice ages followed by warming, numerous times, all occurring before humans existed or had any significant influence on the world around them. .........</span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">In 2010, a global warming conference was</span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> </span><a href="https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/columns/2010/02/10/global-warming-conference-cancelled-because-of-blizzard-in-dc/60920702007/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">cancelled</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> </span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">due to a blizzard in Washington, D.C.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">This is what happens when science is politicized. Mother Nature doesn’t take kindly to those subverting science for personal gain, money, or power. She has a not-so-subtle way of setting the record straight, like snowing on global warming conferences.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">The real climate agenda is government spending taxpayer dollars and increasing centralized power in an ill-fated effort to stop Mother Nature and planetary forces. Any efforts of Al Gore, Bill Gates, King Charles, or Greta Thunberg is mere spitting in the wind of Earth’s billions of years of climate cycles.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Whether COVID or climate, those who subvert science for nefarious purposes, making things up as they go along, end up with egg on their faces. But the cost in life and dollars is borne by the rest of us."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-75448297882683672272023-10-11T21:31:00.002+01:002023-10-11T21:31:25.889+01:00Climate ‘experts’ assure us they weren’t wrong, it was just a ‘miracle’ year<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/10/climate_experts_assure_us_they_werent_wrong_it_was_just_a_miracle_year.html" target="_blank"> Jack Hellner</a></p><p><span id="docs-internal-guid-15587d17-7fff-c91f-ea9d-7ed03884a0bd" style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">Before the record wet winter which saw torrential downpour and floods, the “experts” were predicting a continuous dangerous drought—but the inaccuracy wasn’t because they were wrong, it was simply a miracle! (From a Los Angeles Times </span><a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-just-experienced-miracle-water-100022308.html" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">article</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">, shared via Yahoo) ......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit;">The media and other green pushers conveniently omit information that doesn’t support the “warming” narrative, and don’t want the indoctrinated public to see factual information that would destroy their theory.</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit;">What is actually a miracle is that anyone believes the scam, when previous dire predictions have been wrong 100% of the time. ......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit;">There is only one question they need to ask Joe Biden, John Kerry, or any so-called expert that shows this is just a money grabbing scam—where is the scientific data that shows a link between humans consumption of oil, natural gas, and coal and temperatures? Hint: There is none. The temperature has fluctuated both up and down the last 160 years while our use of these natural resources has rocketed straight up. It is a simple scientific concept that when there is no correlation, you cannot assume causation. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span id="docs-internal-guid-15587d17-7fff-c91f-ea9d-7ed03884a0bd" style="font-size: inherit !important;"><span style="color: red;"><b>The purpose of the scam is greed and to control the people</b></span>.</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-20783375124650770722023-10-08T11:25:00.000+01:002023-10-08T11:25:09.242+01:00Greenpeace Canada Co-Founder Admits "We Are Not In A Climate Crisis"<p><a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/political/greenpeace-canada-co-founder-admits-we-are-not-climate-crisis" target="_blank"> <span style="color: #222222; font-family: DINOT, Impact, sans-serif; font-size: 18.4px; text-transform: uppercase;">TYLER DURDEN</span></a></p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; margin: 0.25em 0px 0.75em;">The co-founder of Greenpeace Canada told podcast host Dan Proft that “climate alarmism is 100% untrue.”</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; margin: 0.25em 0px 0.75em;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">“They said it was the hottest year in the history of the earth the other day, and it’s not,” </strong></em>Moore told Proft on the “Counterculture” podcast.</p><blockquote style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;"><p style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 21px; margin: 0.25em 0px 0.75em;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">“That’s just, period, a lie.”</strong></em></p></blockquote><p style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; margin: 0.25em 0px 0.75em;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">“The whole climate alarmism - ‘climate catastrophe’ - is 100% untrue,” </strong>said Moore.</em></p><blockquote style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;"><p style="box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 21px; margin: 0.25em 0px 0.75em;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;"><em style="box-sizing: border-box;">“We are not in a climate crisis.”</em></strong></p></blockquote><p><span style="color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;">Moore told Proft that “there is nothing really that radical happening” with the climate, and</span><strong style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #222222; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, "Liberation Sans", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;"> it’s essential to “seek the truth” and “sort out what is true and what isn’t.”</strong> </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-67181179209834423182023-10-08T11:22:00.000+01:002023-10-08T11:22:13.847+01:00Global Warming and the Earth's Land Mass<p> <em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit !important; font-weight: 700;"><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/10/global_warming_and_the_earths_land_mass.html" target="_blank">Guy K. Mitchell, Jr.</a></em></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">The goal of scientific research should be to pursue the truth, not confirm a personal or institutional bias. But many analyses of the global warming hypothesis begin with the assumption that man has caused global warming and then proceed to try to prove the thesis, employing pseudoscience in the effort ......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">In my book, I cite published, peer-reviewed scientific research, employing the first principles of the relevant scientific fields of thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, atmospheric physics, and spectroscopy to prove that </span><em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">CO2 </em><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">does not cause global warming......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> It is all about the money and political power. Science has been sacrificed on the altar of political opportunism for economic and political gain.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">The question is not whether global warming has occurred; the data and scientific analysis prove otherwise. The question is, "why do the UN IPCC and certain US and world politicians continue to promote the man-made global warming hypothesis when the science and data prove it to be false?" The legal definition of fraud is intent to deceive."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-52065516344783326872023-10-08T11:17:00.001+01:002023-10-08T11:17:30.596+01:00Cooling the Heat on Climate<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/10/cooling_the_heat_on_climate.html" target="_blank"> <em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> Anthony J. DeBlasi</em></a></p><p>...<span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">That global warming is caused by CO2 is another shot in the dark, since a global so-called “greenhouse effect” attributed to CO2 cannot be finally established, let alone form the basis for attempting to control a gas that is in fact essential to life.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">No one can seriously deny that climate changes. It always has. But so-called “climate change denying” is a phony political smear term. Those at the receiving end of this accusation justifiably cry foul against politically branded “climate change” policy that calls for fleecing the public and subjecting millions (billions?) of people to extreme hardship and possible starvation. And for what? A miniscule rise in temperature since the last Ice Age?.....<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Climate change alarmism is ironically leading to a growing skepticism, a sign I think that its doomsday scenario is headed for a doomsday of its own making. The great falsehood that there is </span><a href="https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/michael-crichton-explains-why-there-is-no-such-thing-as-consensus-science/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: 18.64px;">scientific consensus</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> on climate change condemns the alarmist projection of a looming climate disaster to the proverbial dustbin of history."</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-34609888870699863062023-10-08T11:11:00.001+01:002023-10-08T11:11:13.177+01:00The Climate Change-Industrial Complex is an Existential Threat<p> <a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/10/the_climate_changeindustrial_complex_is_an_existential_threat.html" target="_blank">Chris Talgo</a></p><p>........<span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">As a matter of fact, the climate change-industrial complex, which will be explained below, began decades ago when </span><a href="https://www.sciencenews.org/article/50-years-ago-scientists-puzzled-over-slight-global-cooling" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;" target="_blank">scientists warned of “global cooling”</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> and the coming of a modern ice age. Eventually, the global cooling “crisis” morphed into </span><a href="https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-10-29-mn-194-story.html" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;" target="_blank">“global warming,”</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> which then morphed again into what we now know as “climate change.” ....</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">Like the military-industrial complex, which referred to the insidious relationship between the military, defense contractors, and government and their aim to constantly increase military spending, a similar dynamic exists today among the climate change-industrial complex. ....</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">In the name of “climate change,” our political leaders have run roughshod over our core constitutional freedoms, mandating what </span><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/business/incandescent-light-bulb-ban/index.html" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit !important;" target="_blank">products we can buy</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> and </span><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/biden-climate-advisor-tech-companies-censor-disinformation-promote-benefits-clean-energy" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit !important;" target="_blank">censoring</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> those who dare to question the “climate change” narrative.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Meanwhile, countless corporations and “experts” have jumped on the “climate change” bandwagon, some for fear of retribution if they do not, with scores of others willingly doing so because they benefit in some form or fashion from the perpetuation of the “climate change crisis.” ....<span style="font-size: 18.64px;"><b><span style="color: red;">In reality, the climate change-industrial complex is nothing more than a Trojan horse, a guise under which the beneficiaries can implement their vision of how society should be “organized</span>.</b>”</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-77060592292638374682023-08-13T15:57:00.000+01:002023-08-13T15:57:01.612+01:00‘Global Warming’ Morphs Into ‘Global Boiling’ as the Global Climate Hoax Turns Up the Heat<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/08/global_warming_morphs_into_global_boiling_as_the_global_climate_hoax_turns_up_the_heat.html" target="_blank"> <em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit !important; font-weight: 700;">Jerome R. Corsi </em></a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">"....This all-too-obvious coordinated drumroll of frightening climate change warnings has become the propaganda technique of choice for international organizations who presume responsibility for controlling Earth’s climate. <b><span style="color: red;">The only problem with the current theme of the month—namely, that July 2023 was the “hottest” month on record—is that it is NOT true</span></b>. But truthfulness is apparently a less worthy goal to the UN, the WMO, and the European Commission than making sure we stop using hydrocarbon fuels, the energy that has allowed modern industrial states to prosper during our good fortune to be experiencing an interglacial warming period. The whole point of these announcements is to scare people. “Climate change is here,” <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/07/1139162" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">the UN chief said</a>. “It is terrifying. And it’s just beginning.”</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">The lying appears ubiquitous among government agencies monitoring the weather. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <a href="https://climatecite.com/epa-disappears-the-1930s-drought-and-heat-wave-climate-data/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">has “disappeared” an internet page that demonstrated</a> that, 90 years ago, we experienced <a href="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/05/21/epa-disappears-the-1930s-drought-and-heat-wave-climate-data/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">a far greater wave of heat than we are experiencing today</a>. For now, the NASA “Global Climate Change” website still displays an article by Ellen Gray, NASA’s Earth Science News Team, that <a href="https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2175/nasa-study-finds-1934-had-worst-drought-of-last-thousand-years/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">features a scientific study</a> demonstrating that we experienced the worst drought of the last thousand years in 1934 during the “dust bowl” years of the Depression. How long it will remain there is unclear. ....<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Meteorologist Ryan Maue mocked </span><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/25/heat-wave-us-europe-climate-change/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: 18.64px;">a July 24 <em style="font-size: inherit !important;">Washington Post</em> article</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> with a headline blaring, “Heat waves in the U.S., Europe ‘virtually impossible’ without climate change, study finds. </span><a href="https://twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/1683722910165237761" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: 18.64px;">Maue quipped on Twitter</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> [now rebranded as “X”], “I guess that’s true if you memory hole 1925, 1930s, 1950s, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2012, 2020, etc. and the rest of the almanac.” In a follow-up Tweet, Maue continued the theme:......</span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Cliff Mass, professor of Atmospheric Studies at the University of Washington, </span><a href="https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/08/03/top-climate-scientists-rubbish-claims-july-was-the-hottest-month-ever-public-being-misinformed-on-a-massive-scale/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: 18.64px;">rubbished the claim</a><span style="font-size: 18.64px;"> that July 2023 was the hottest month ever. Mass noted the climate was “radically warmer” around 1,000 years ago during the Medieval Warm Period when agriculture thrived in parts of now ice-covered Greenland. <b>“If you really go back far enough there were swamps near the North Pole, and the other thing to keep in mind is that we’re coming out of a cold period, a Little Ice Age from roughly 1600 to 1850</b>.”</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-16170298028108320562023-08-13T15:29:00.002+01:002023-08-13T15:29:38.723+01:00Scientific Censorship Reaches New Heights<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/08/scientific_censorship_reaches_new_heights.html" target="_blank"> <em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: inherit !important; font-weight: 700;">Guy K. Mitchell, Jr</em></a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">On February 15, 2023, David Malpass, the president of the World Bank, announced that he would retire one year early on June 1, 2023. On July 21, 2023, Pablo Moreno, the director of the Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund, read the flyer that described the address that Dr. John F. Clauser was scheduled to give to the IMF on July 27, 2023. As a result, he summarily canceled Dr. Clauser's planned address.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">What do Malpass and Clauser have in common? They have both acknowledged that they do not believe in the global warming hypothesis. .........<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">In the case of Dr. Clauser, he is a theoretical physicist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2022, as well as the Wolf Prize in Physics in 2010. The Wolf Prize is widely recognized as the second most prestigious award after the Nobel. Both awards were for contributions that Dr. Clauser made in the field of quantum mechanics for his groundbreaking work on the subject of the quantum entanglement of particles. Dr. Clauser's sin? He addressed the 2023 Korea Quantum Conference, where he stated, <b>"I don't believe there is a climate crisis. The world we live in today is filled with misinformation. It is up to each of you to serve as judges, distinguishing truth from falsehood based on accurate observations of phenomena</b>." Dr. Clauser had previously criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming and told President Biden that he disagrees with his climate policies."</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-75376139357801873092023-07-24T10:54:00.002+01:002023-07-24T10:54:56.825+01:00Study accidentally proves man-caused global warming not provable<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/07/study_accidentally_proves_mancaused_global_warming_not_provable.html" target="_blank"> Eric Utter</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">According to a study recently published in the journal Science<em style="font-size: inherit !important;">,</em> and latched onto by USA Today, more than 400,000 years ago, Greenland was actually <a href="file:///C:/Users/mmsho/Downloads/Bierman%20said,%20" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">green</a>. Yes, scientists say, the massive island was an ice-free landscape and was perhaps even covered with trees.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">This is important to know, avers study co–lead author Paul Bierman of the University of Vermont, because it tells us that "Greenland's ice sheet is fragile." Bierman stated: "All by itself, during a warm period very similar to today, the ice sheet melted away 400,000 years ago. That was without fossil fuel emissions into the atmosphere."</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">An ice sheet melted "all by itself"? Here is a "scientist" telling us that we must immediately change our lifestyles and bankrupt our economies to prevent something that occurred naturally and without human influence 400,000 years ago! ...."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-35568433292383353652023-07-24T10:52:00.001+01:002023-07-24T10:52:48.911+01:00Warming-obsessed media wrong again<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/07/warmingobsessed_media_wrong_again.html" target="_blank"> Vijay Jayaraj</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">There is not much new about media hyperbole in weather reporting, but July’s climate alarmism may be more breathless than usual.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and other social media were inundated with posts containing flaming red maps of Southern Europe and Northern Africa......<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">These commentators conveniently ignore below average temperatures in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe and large swaths of Russia. In fact, people in my city here in India were wearing sweaters during the same week despite it being the middle of a tropical summer.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Even in the U.S., temperatures have not been as dangerous as portrayed. Chris Martz, a meteorologist, <a href="https://twitter.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1682580945340080129" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">notes that</a> “the entire Lower 48 is only nine-hundredths of a degree Fahrenheit above average [relative to 1991-2020]. Month-to-date temperatures are much cooler this year than just last year and are nothing compared to 1980 or 2011.”</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-36193773035231229382023-07-24T10:48:00.003+01:002023-07-24T10:48:19.928+01:00A Leading Climate Scientist Expresses Doubt About the Veracity of the Global Warming Movement<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/07/a_leading_climate_scientist_expresses_doubt_about_the_veracity_of_the_global_warming_movement.html" target="_blank"> Jerome R Corsi</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">In her new book, Curry acknowledges that a changing climate “has been the norm throughout the Earth’s 4.6-billion-year history.” She refuses to abandon the idea that we humans “are also changing atmospheric composition by increasing the emissions of CO<span style="bottom: -0.25em; font-size: inherit !important; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;">2</span> and other greenhouse gases,” but she adds an important caveat:</p><div id="v-americanthinker" style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"></div><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">This redefinition of “climate change” to refer only to human-caused changes to the atmospheric composition has effectively eliminated natural climate change from the public discussion.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">The result is that the common parlance refers to “climate change,” with no mention of natural climate variability. Any change that is observed over the past century is now implicitly assumed to be caused by human emissions to the atmosphere. This assumption leads to connecting every unusual weather or climate event to human-caused climate change from fossil fuel emissions. Having acknowledged that climate change is the “norm” throughout the Earth’s 4.6-billion-year history, Curry understands that this politicized attribution of all climate change to humans burning hydrocarbon fuels is nonsense."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-38476416977911740222023-07-05T12:35:00.001+01:002023-07-05T12:35:58.270+01:00On global warming, so many problems with the data<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/05/on_global_warming_so_many_problems_with_the_data.html" target="_blank"> Jack Hellner</a></p><p><br /></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">We have been told for years that we would have snowless winters, not that sometimes we would have record snows, as we did out west this year.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">We have been told that oceans are rising rapidly, and coastal cities would soon be underwater, not that they have risen an essentially immeasurable 9 inches in 140 years.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Why don't the media and other green pushers tell the truth instead of giving dire predictions? The answer is that people wouldn't capitulate if they learned the truth......<span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Why are people, especially children, told the intentional lie that thousands of species are dying each year because of humans and our use of natural resources when the truth is that scientists can identify only 800 animal species that have gone extinct in the last 400 years, or two per year? The answer is clearly that the truth would not get support for the radical green agenda. ......</span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">Why should anyone trust the same people who did the following when they said they could control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity, if we just hand over trillions, and give up our freedom and quality of life? .....</span><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">They lied that we could keep our health plan and doctor, and our premiums would go down.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">They lied throughout COVID and then claimed to be surprised when children became depressed and their test scores went down.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">They refused to control the border but lied that the border was closed.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">They supported soft-on-crime district attorneys but claimed they weren't soft on crime even as crime goes up.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">They lied continuously to destroy Trump without evidence and refused to support his policies, which were lifting all races.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">They lied to get the corrupt, incompetent Biden into office.</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-16124691403179685952023-07-05T12:28:00.002+01:002023-07-05T12:28:51.221+01:00Why hasn't it been a big story that LA has had record cool temperatures in 2023?<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/07/why_hasnt_it_been_a_big_story_that_la_has_had_record_cool_temperatures_in_2023_.html" target="_blank"> Jack Hellner</a></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">"<i>From May 1 to June 29, a 60-day stretch, the high temperature in downtown Los Angeles did not reach 80. It is the longest recorded streak of days with high temperatures below 80 during May and June in downtown Los Angeles since 1878.</i></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><i>The previous longest streak was 59 days from May 2 to June 29 in 1916. The highest temperature during the current streak was 79 on June 17 and June 21</i>."</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span style="font-size: 18.64px;">The reason the story of record cool temperatures in LA is not widely reported is the same reason the public rarely if ever sees the following stories. They don’t fit the radical green agenda to remake or destroy America. Facts don’t matter to leftists when they are pushing an agenda. "</span><span style="background-color: whitesmoke; font-size: 18.64px;"><i>A brutal cold wave has swept northern India, blanketing streets in freezing fog, intensifying pollution, disrupting hundreds of flights and prompting school closures</i>."</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Global warming, climate change, caused by humans has always been a scam to get more government control of our lives and to funnel large amounts of money to leftists.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">It is absolutely pathetic that the media just repeats what they are told on global warming or climate change without doing any research. And not once have they asked Biden, Kerry, Gore, Gates, Obama, or any green pusher for scientific data which supports the green agenda either because they know none exists or because they don’t care."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-40394399708938864182023-07-02T16:54:00.003+01:002023-07-02T16:54:54.740+01:00"The Greatest History Never Told" - Full Feature Explains All! <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTwOuN39VHo&t=1182s" target="_blank"> Ivor Cummins</a> (Ireland)</p><p><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #131313; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;">This evening at 7:30pm UK time (</span><span style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); color: #0f0f0f; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">Jun 24, 2023)</span><span style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); color: #131313; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;"> we premiere the session I recorded recently in Stockholm with Dr. Jacob Nordangard, and it is packed with illustrations and clips to make it a docu-drama! It covers everything of importance: the geopolitical history of Rockefeller/Carnegie/Ford foundations, thru to the Rockefeller influential dominance in the 1940's. Their creation of League of Nations (soon to become the United Nations & WHO). The intrigue accelerates with the founding of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome, European Management Forum (to soon become the World Economic Forum), UN Agenda 21, the Earth Charter Commission, the G20 - and a dizzying array of increasingly powerful organizations thru to the 2000's.</span></p><p><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #131313; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;">A truly pivotal moment occurred in 2019, when the massively expanded World Economic Forum...quietly signed a partnering contract with the United Nations (an event with massive implications - but zero media coverage, of course).
In short this epic production explains the bizarre behavior of Covid, Climate, Trans, etc, etc. - the whole shooting match, decoded. I'm not exaggerating...!
DOWNLOAD this video here to share elsewhere: </span><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #065fd4; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a class="yt-core-attributed-string__link yt-core-attributed-string__link--display-type yt-core-attributed-string__link--call-to-action-color" force-new-state="true" href="https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbkRkeTFZNThQVy1aaEFiYkRlLVVTRk9GZVgyUXxBQ3Jtc0trWW5sVkozb0VsQUZCZUpqREt6RXgxb0FiTnNKcE9nV2VIQWVDRkM2WW9LbFU4bm1wNkFxOE5haUxwQWdDVk9MZWNjRnd3Z3FmNm4yNGJseVlOMWRqc3BSUW44X245ZXRxTGQ5REIxUDBBUXFtVGxSSQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwe.tl%2Ft-LP659ywH2v&v=yTwOuN39VHo" rel="nofollow" style="display: inline; text-decoration-line: none;" tabindex="0" target="_blank">https://we.tl/t-LP659ywH2v</a></span><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #131313; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;">
Dr. Nordangård's incredible historical record publication (scroll down for eBook version): </span><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #065fd4; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a class="yt-core-attributed-string__link yt-core-attributed-string__link--display-type yt-core-attributed-string__link--call-to-action-color" force-new-state="true" href="https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbmRUbVZXZHZaVWcxSmltOGd4MFNVcklOTWR4QXxBQ3Jtc0trN2FRNTZhMUlUaFRZNjdVYlduaXU0Zks0M0FyNGE5UWg2LVNHdHJjMGR4Y0lSeXNmM3lYMjVsbTRGaDZPeEVQaXZkMTEwRGZTLUxlUUYzV28zWl82dDB0LWdhMTk5czhNa0NKSUVUc3hvNnJyZUNLYw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pharosmedia.se%2Fshop%23%21%2Fjacob-nordang%25C3%25A5rd%2Fproducts%2Frockefeller---controlling-the-game&v=yTwOuN39VHo" rel="nofollow" style="display: inline; text-decoration-line: none;" tabindex="0" target="_blank">https://www.pharosmedia.se/shop#!/jac...</a> </span></p><p><span class="yt-core-attributed-string--link-inherit-color" style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); border: 0px; color: #065fd4; font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-family: Roboto, Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b>ED; This is why the Covid scam played well with the Climate Change scam..... its all about control, money and the "new world order" WEF project.... watch the documentary all the way through .....</b> </span></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-70200712044656920102023-06-30T11:31:00.001+01:002023-06-30T11:32:09.593+01:00The Controlled Demolition of Nation-States<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/the_controlled_demolition_of_nationstates.html" target="_blank"> J.B. Shurk</a> ()MUST READ)</p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">Why would nations give a bunch of global bankers a monopoly to control the supply of money, when that awesome power allows them to impoverish and manage everyone else? Why would politicians who claim to care about income inequality perpetuate a system that </span><em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">specializes</em><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> in producing income inequality? The answer is simple: governments are concerned exclusively with power and do not care about preserving democratic ideals, personal freedom, or the livelihoods of their people ......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">Call it </span><a href="https://cdn.mises.org/Road%20to%20serfdom.pdf" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;" target="_blank">the road to serfdom</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">. Call it socialism hiding inside the Trojan horse of late-stage capitalism. Call it Marxist globalism intent on creating a small class of masters and several continents of slaves. Whatever it is called, it represents the controlled demolition of entire nation-states. When central banks and politicians work together to fleece ordinary citizens, they create the conditions for despotism, poverty, and...</span><em style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">sometimes</em><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">...revolutions for change. ....."</span></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"><span style="color: red;">ED: This is what "climate change" is all about - CONTROL</span></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-54262084152684608132023-06-30T11:25:00.003+01:002023-06-30T11:25:45.884+01:00The Contradictions of Carbon Capture<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/the_contradictions_of_carbon_capture.html" target="_blank"> John M. Contino</a></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">In May, 2022, the Biden Administration announced a $3.5 billion program to </span><a href="https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-administration-launches-35-billion-program-capture-carbon-pollution-air-0" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">capture carbon</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;"> pollution from the air, and the money has been flowing copiously. A quick search on LinkedIn for companies engaged in Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) projects will reveal dozens of companies, most of which are U.S.-based. They are well-staffed and generously funded with millions of up-front taxpayer dollars.......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">The hyperbolic language of the climate change crowd has been wearing thin ever since Al Gore’s dire predictions from 2006 have inconveniently<span style="color: red;"> not materialized</span>. It’s up to us to make the left realize they’ve overplayed their hand: they cannot ride roughshod over property rights whenever it suits them, just as they cannot force us to drink Bud Light if we don’t wish to do so."</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-43386027629081170332023-05-17T16:33:00.001+01:002023-05-17T16:33:09.581+01:00Germany’s Federal Network Agency Plans To Ration Electricity As Electric Power Crisis Heightens<p><a href="https://notrickszone.com/2023/05/16/germanys-federal-network-agency-plans-to-ration-electricity-as-electric-power-crisis-heightens/" target="_blank"> NoTricksZone</a></p><p style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: none; color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, Times, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 21px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><strong style="background: transparent; border: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Greatest energy folly of all time?</strong></p><p style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: none; color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, Times, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 21px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">No one could have imagined a folly of this scale less than 2 years ago, just before the current Socialist-Green government took over the reins of power at the end of 2021. Other countries may want to avoid the idiotic German path."</p><p style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: none; color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, Times, "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 21px; outline: none; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-701252484099048362023-05-17T16:30:00.004+01:002023-05-17T16:30:56.736+01:00French President Macron Sells Out Climate Activists, Calls for a “Pause” in New Regulations<p><a href="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/05/17/french-president-macron-sells-out-climate-activists-calls-for-a-pause-in-new-regulations/" target="_blank">WUWT </a></p><p><span style="background-color: white; color: #070707; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;">President Macron has chosen to dump climate activists in his desperate struggle to save his political skin from the rise of French Conservative Marine Le Pen. .......</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #070707; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;">Macron is now desperate to distance himself from climate issues a little, to prevent more of his working class industrial belt supporters defecting to his rival Marine Le-Pen. France has been rent by widespread protests against pension reforms and cost of living rises. The situation in France is now so unstable, </span><a href="https://www.espn.com/nrl/story/_/id/37657640/france-withdraws-host-2025-world-cup#" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #d10014; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">France has cancelled hosting the World Cup Soccer tournament in 2025</a><span style="background-color: white; color: #070707; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;">, claiming they don’t have enough money to support the event – but more likely, Macron is worried football violence could escalate into a popular uprising against his heavy handed incompetence."</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-31928332864817878632023-05-17T16:28:00.002+01:002023-05-17T16:28:56.153+01:00Lomborg: ‘Organic agriculture’ could optimistically support 4.7 billion people – ‘Industrial agriculture’ could optimistically support 12 billion – Current global population is 8 billion<p><a href="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/05/14/lomborg-organic-agriculture-could-optimistically-support-4-7-billion-people-industrial-agriculture-could-optimistically-support-12-billion-curr/" target="_blank"> WUWT</a></p><p><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); border: 0px solid black; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0f1419; display: inline; font-family: TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; min-width: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;">New Nature paper:
w/extreme yields (everywhere highest today)
+current share of feed-food competition (57%, much food to animal production)
Organic agriculture can support 4.7 billion
Industrial agriculture (w/fossil nitrogen) can support 12 billion
</span><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" dir="ltr" style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.03); border: 0px solid black; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0f1419; display: inline; font-family: TwitterChirp, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; min-width: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span aria-hidden="true" class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-hiw28u r-qvk6io r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" style="border: 0px solid black; box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit; display: inline; font-family: inherit; font-size: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: 0px; margin: 0px; min-width: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; white-space: inherit;">https://</span>nature.com/articles/s4301<span aria-hidden="true" class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-hiw28u r-qvk6io r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" style="border: 0px solid black; box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit; display: inline; font-family: inherit; font-size: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: 0px; margin: 0px; min-width: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; white-space: inherit;">6-023-00741-w</span></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-60791035016789446732023-05-17T16:20:00.001+01:002023-05-17T16:20:21.861+01:00Why would anyone believe these people can control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever?<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/05/why_would_anyone_believe_these_people_can_control_temperatures_sea_levels_and_storm_activity_forever.html" target="_blank"> American Thinker</a></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">The people who say they can control the climate forever if we are forced to buy electric cars and give up a lot of other stuff somehow can't figure out how to have AM radio stations </span><a href="https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/05/15/they-finally-figured-out-how-to-attack-conservative-talk-radio-mark-levin-criticizes-automakers-dropping-am-radio/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">without interference from electric vehicles</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">.......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">Does anyone think they can solve all the economic and environmentally harmful issues related to electric vehicles? Here is some information about electric vehicles that the complicit media will not be allowed to see. This information is as censored as the stories showing Biden family corruption. ......</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">And the last problem is this. Even if all the predictions were true and we all changed to electric, the temperature would only be reduced by a few 10ths of a degree in 80 years. Anyone who believes that prediction when the weather can't be predicted even for tomorrow should see if they have lost their ability to think.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Why would we spend trillions, greatly destroy our quality of life, and destroy industries that directly and indirectly employ tens of millions to supposedly adjust temperatures by a miniscule amount? "</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-45527247745392254112023-05-15T21:55:00.004+01:002023-05-15T21:55:50.799+01:00The IPCC Radical Climate Change Agenda Is a Neo-Marxist, Postmodern Value Narrative <p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/05/the_ipcc_radical_climate_change_agenda_is_a_neomarxist_postmodern_value_narrative.html" target="_blank"> American Thinker</a></p><p style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">In combating the global warming (aka, climate change) movement, we fail to understand that the radical left today lives in a value-relative phenomenology shaped by a mixture of postmodernism blended with neo-Marxism. It misses the mark merely to refute the hoax science behind the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s decision to eliminate the use of hydrocarbon fuels.</p><p style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">The sad truth is that government-funded climate scientists know CO2 is not the control knob of Earth’s temperature. The postmodernist mind lives in the John Lennon world where “reimagining” is required to advance us into their carbon-free utopia. In this bizarre world, post-modernism rejects the Enlightenment’s confidence in a fact-based, rule-driven reality anchored by scientific proof that overrides subjective desires. To them, reality is a “language game” (in Wittgenstein’s terms) or, as they say, a “narrative.”......<span style="background-color: white;">In 2018, the IPCC </span><a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">issued a policy statement requiring governments</a><span style="background-color: white;"> to limit or discontinue the burning of hydrocarbon fuels to reduce the emission of CO2 to keep the planet from exceeding 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. Politically correct global warming/climate change true believers assume all who love Earth must think we have no choice but to abandon hydrocarbon fuels. The IPCC “scientific consensus” is operative on a normative level, not as an Enlightenment science-tested statement of proven fact."</span></p><p><span style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /><br /><br /></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-68137244630390419882023-05-15T21:52:00.003+01:002023-05-15T21:52:26.283+01:003 Damning Equations to Defeat Global Warming Zealots<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/05/3_damning_equations_to_defeat_global_warming_zealots.html" target="_blank"> American Thinker</a></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">The true economic, social, and political cost of the measures proposed by governments (in the West only) to destroy their nations' businesses and jobs and to impoverish every household is becoming ever more visible. At last, therefore, a few brave souls in the scientific and academic communities are beginning to question what I shall call — with more than a little justification — the Communist Party line on climate change. ......</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">However, the three equations stand firmly in the way. It is these three equations — simple enough to be explained here for the general reader, yet devastating enough utterly to destroy the official climate change narrative — that will soon lay low the enemies of prosperity, democracy, and liberty who have, until now, gotten away with undermining the West, no less from within than from without, by their childishly apocalyptic climate change narrative. .......</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Therefore, I said, every $1 billion the world squanders on trying to get to net zero emissions by 2050 would prevent only one 16-millionth of a degree of warming. ..."</span><span style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", trebuchet, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-34945474614792596002023-05-15T21:44:00.002+01:002023-05-15T21:44:29.257+01:00The Industrial Revolution has had a minimal effect on atmospheric CO2<p><a href="https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/05/the_industrial_revolution_has_had_a_minimal_effect_on_atmospheric_co2.html" target="_blank">American Thinker </a></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">In February 2022, Health Physics published a little-noticed study that recently received so much attention, the publisher removed the paywall behind which the article previously hid. The article’s title is mind-numbing: “</span><a href="https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Fulltext/2022/02000/World_Atmospheric_CO2,_Its_14C_Specific_Activity,.2.aspx" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">World Atmospheric CO<span style="bottom: -0.25em; font-size: inherit !important; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;">2</span>, Its <span style="font-size: inherit !important; line-height: 0; position: relative; top: -0.5em; vertical-align: baseline;">14</span>C Specific Activity, Non-fossil Component, Anthropogenic Fossil Component, and Emissions (1750–2018)</a><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">.” The three authors are all academics in the field of radiology with ties to the University of Massachusetts Lowell </span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">According to the study, it is true that CO2 began to increase a bit with the Industrial Revolution. However, the increase in CO2 because of human fossil fuel use has been negligible and could not have caused the climate to change. Here’s the authors’ abstract: .........</span><span style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px;">There are two actual, stubborn facts to note. First, the Earth’s climate has been changing without pause since it came into being. Indeed, the Earth is incredibly dynamic. I live near the South Carolina coast. Although I’m several miles inland from the Atlantic Ocean, there is sand everywhere. That’s because my neck of the woods used to be the bottom of a primeval ocean. In the same way, the Sahara Desert was once a verdant primeval forest. The Earth’s climate changed, and humans adapted because that’s what they do.</span></p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">Second, plants need CO2. I happen to know some (legal) marijuana growers who pump CO2 into their indoor crop to facilitate its growth. More CO2, not less CO2, is good for human beings.</p><p style="font-family: "times new roman", times, serif; font-size: 18.64px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;">That leftists are so terrified of something that makes food more, rather than less, available for people across the planet tells you everything you need to know about their long-term agenda for humankind. The favored people will live in comfortable enclaves with good food of the type routinely served at <a href="https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2023/01/20/guess-what-wef23-attendees-are-dining-on-while-asking-us-to-embrace-a-meatless-future/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; font-size: inherit !important;">World Economic Forum gatherings</a>. The rest of us will be at the mercy of painfully hot or cold weather and survive on a diet of bugs and lab-grown sludge."</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7329699378356122527.post-46352506055768325512022-09-03T14:25:00.003+01:002022-09-03T14:25:40.871+01:00Western leaders are madder than I thought<p><a href="https://unherd.com/thepost/western-leaders-are-madder-than-i-thought/" target="_blank"> Unherd</a></p><p>Europe is belatedly grappling with the (entirely foreseeable)
consequences of imposing sanctions on Russia. The Nord Stream pipeline
has been intermittently closed over the summer, reportedly for
“maintenance” (which no one believes). Another closure has just been <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/aug/31/nord-stream-1-russia-switches-off-gas-pipeline-citing-maintenance">announced</a>.</p><p>
As a result, prices are rocketing across the continent, with the ripple effects already being felt by businesses and consumers. </p><p>-----</p><p>From the comments:</p><p><em>"This certainly has to do with Russian sanctions, but that isn’t the whole story… by any stretch.The serious misery we are only just beginning to experience is far
more the result of decades of short-termist policy making re energy
security, and pandering (and I would argue ‘elite capture’ – an almost
cult-like groupthink among the elite/governing classes) and their naive
wholesale stampede toward the ruinous policy of Net Zero …well before we
have any adequate infrastructure or technology in place to replace the ‘old’ energy types [namely oil, coal and gas]."</em></p><p><em> "The rot started in 1997 when Blair stopped all new nuclear projects and
was made worse by Milliband’s disastrous 2008 Climate Change Act. The
2010 coalition continued the nonsense with the LibDems insisting on
having the Energy Department under their control.<br />
And yes, it’s got worse since 2015 with undeliverable policies on gas
boilers, petrol/diesel vehicles and heat pumps making a bad situation
worse.<br />
All political parties have been singing from the same hymn sheet and now we haven’t got a prayer."</em></p><p><em> "</em><em>This article completely misses the point – this energy and cost of
living crisis was not caused by western leaders’ failure to appease an
aggressive tyrant’s unprovoked invasion of a democratic neighbour, but
by them adopting energy policies which allowed them to become dependent
on and at the mercy of this particular tyrant for many of their energy
needs in the first place. An ultra-nationalist bully like Vladimir Putin
was always going to start a major war eventually, and now he has."</em></p><p><em>"If the West had not thoroughly embraced Green energy and gone away from
reliable, cheap coal and nuclear it would not be in the big crunch it is
in now.<br />
It will take more than 100 years to displace fossil fuels, if they even
need to be displaced (AGW is BS). What is the big rush? Why immiserate
the people for a pipe dream? (Oh, yeah, it makes them feel virtuous!)" <br /></em></p><p></p><p> </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0