New Scientist: Oops, the glaciers won’t have melted by 2035

Climategate.com
"The New Scientist swallowed its pride and has come clean about the hysterical claim they made in their magazine in 1999, that the Himalayan glaciers would be gone by the year 2035. It turns out it was just “speculation” by a glaciologist at the time. But the big deal is that this speculation became an IPCC “finding.” ".
(When speculation becomes 'fact'... a good post from Climategate.com)
-----------------------
Is the NOAA, not CRU, is ground zero for exaggerated warming data?
"Well, well, well. In a new report (read PDF), computer expert E. Michael Smith and Certified Consulting Meteorologist Joseph D’Aleo discovered extensive manipulation of the temperature data by the U.S. Government’s two primary climate centers:"
(Another good follow-up post from Climategate.com)