The battle of Amazongate

Dr Richard North
"..With no more evidence than he had to support the original assertion that 40 percent of the forest was at risk from a slight reduction in precipitation, the "lead scientist" has honed a new alibi. It is all a misunderstanding. The IPCC has not got it wrong, dear me no. We have misinterpreted what it has said.

Understandably, Booker and I disagree."

----------------------------
Booker, North, and Willis on the IPCC Amazongate affair (WUWT)