Andrew Bolt,Herald Sun (Australia)
"Professor Ross McKitrick on how “peer review” has corrupted the global warming debate:
Starting in 2007, I spent two years trying to publish a paper to refute an important claim in the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (on how real-world data allegedly confirmed models predicting a recent man-made warming).
The claim in question was not just wrong but was based on fabricated evidence. Showing that the claim was fabricated was easy: it suffices merely to quote the section of the report, since no supporting evidence is given.... "
No comments:
Post a Comment