For the past 50 years the environmental
movement has been in thrall to a simple, powerful and utterly wrong
idea: that the best way to save the planet is to curtail human activity,
whether in the form of breeding, building, burning or business. Anybody
who suggests a different strategy – that economic activity is not just
compatible with environmental benefits, but vital to creating and
improving them – has been howled down. But that is changing, and a new idea is gaining ground, under the term
“Ecomodernism”. The key idea behind Ecomodernism is that the more
technology human beings adopt, the more they can decouple from
dependence on the natural environment and live lives that are prosperous
but green. ......Something remarkable is happening to the
human race. Today’s seven billion people have both more food and more
nature reserves than the five billion of 30 years ago. We in developed
countries are using less land, less fertiliser and less water to produce
more food. We are using less iron and less wood to build more
buildings. We are using less oil and less gas to achieve each increment
of economic growth. We are using fewer trees for paper and copper for
wires, to communicate with. The Green Blob
said non-renewable resources, like oil, copper and phosphorus, were
going to run out, whereas in fact they grew more abundant and cheaper.
It said hunger was going to get worse, whereas in fact it has vastly
improved, except in countries like North Korea...... The reason poor countries have the worst environmental problems is that
they have not yet made these transitions. They are still relying on
renewable, natural resources such as wood and bushmeat to support their
lifestyles. They are still coupled to the natural environment."
No comments:
Post a Comment