Real Science
The Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia used to show
the “hiatus” very clearly. Then they talked it over with their fellow
fraudsters at NOAA and NASA – and made the hiatus disappear by switching
to a new version of their data. If you remove their recent 0.1 degree data tampering, then 1998 becomes the hottest year – which agrees with satellites. Previously, CRU had excellent agreement with satellites about the
hiatus. Satellites are supposed to show larger swings than surface data,
but the trend was the same. Also note how satellite data shows
much larger spikes during El Nino events, like 1998 and 2010. The new CRU data creates a warming trend where there is none. But the
real smoking gun of fraud is the divergence with satellites during the
current El Nino. They should be converging, not diverging. "
No comments:
Post a Comment