WUWT
This essay is a critique Francis and Vavrus (2012), hereinafter FV
(2012), by atmospheric scientists Jennifer Francis from Rutgers
University and Steve Vavrus of the University of Wisconsin. Their paper
can be downloaded here: ..........What is particularly disturbing about FV (2012) is not only is it
incorrect and flawed, but it passed peer review. Now, after publication,
FV (2012) has been lapped up by media, touted and referenced in their
severe weather stories that report on hurricanes, tornadoes, severe
thunderstorms, heat, cold, drought and any other weather calamity as
“proof” their paper is correct. Nothing could be further from the truth. ................
The continued misuse, abuse and general trashing of important
principles founded with atmospheric science remains as deplorable as
ever by the groups promoting global warming from human CO2 emissions or
by these same groups promoting climate hysteria by re-labeling this term
“climate change”.
Now that the flawed FV (2012) passed peer review, it allows media to
blame any severe weather on “climate change.” FV (2012) allows media to
claim a wavier jet stream dips and meanders because the Arctic is
supposedly getting warmer. All this is sheer nonsense and all
demonstrably wrong.
I believe this flawed FV (2012) also shows how the quality of the
scientific peer review process has been lowered in “climate science”.
No comments:
Post a Comment