Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
1) No Recent Warming. If global warming science is
so “settled”, why did global warming stop over 15 years ago (in most
temperature datasets), contrary to all “consensus” predictions?
2) Natural or Manmade? If we don’t know how much of
the warming in the longer term (say last 50 years) is natural, then how
can we know how much is manmade?
3) IPCC Politics and Beliefs. Why does it take a
political body (the IPCC) to tell us what scientists “believe”? And
when did scientists’ “beliefs” translate into proof? And when was
scientific truth determined by a vote…especially when those allowed to
vote are from the Global Warming Believers Party?
4) Climate Models Can’t Even Hindcast How did
climate modelers, who already knew the answer, still fail to explain the
lack of a significant temperature rise over the last 30+ years? In
other words, how to you botch a hindcast?
5) …But We Should Believe Model Forecasts? Why should we believe model predictions of the future, when they can’t even explain the past?
6) Modelers Lie About Their “Physics”. Why do
modelers insist their models are based upon established physics, but
then hide the fact that the strong warming their models produce is
actually based upon very uncertain “fudge factor” tuning?
7) Is Warming Even Bad? Who decided that a small amount of warming is necessarily a bad thing?
8) Is CO2 Bad? How did carbon dioxide, necessary
for life on Earth and only 4 parts in 10,000 of our atmosphere, get
rebranded as some sort of dangerous gas?
9) Do We Look that Stupid? How do scientists expect
to be taken seriously when their “theory” is supported by both floods
AND droughts? Too much snow AND too little snow?
10) Selective Pseudo-Explanations. How can
scientists claim that the Medieval Warm Period (which lasted hundreds of
years), was just a regional fluke…yet claim the single-summer (2003)
heat wave in Europe had global significance?
11) (Spinal Tap bonus) Just How Warm is it, Really?
Why is it that every subsequent modification/adjustment to the global
thermometer data leads to even more warming? What are the chances of
that? Either a warmer-still present, or cooling down the past, both of
which produce a greater warming trend over time. And none of the
adjustments take out a gradual urban heat island (UHI) warming around
thermometer sites, which likely exists at virtually all of them —
because no one yet knows a good way to do that.
No comments:
Post a Comment