The Reference Frame
The word "pollution" in that sentence is a piece of a dirty toxic
propaganda, of course. In reality, they talk about CO2 which is no
pollution in any sense – it is a natural gas that unavoidably
accompanies a big part of the essential economic activities in the
modern world and that is the primary source of the biological material
within plants – and therefore also animals.
By 2030, the coal burners have to emit 30% less carbon dioxide than in
2030, and so on. Will they? Is that possible? I don't know. America may
need much more coal in 2030 than it needs today and it will emit more
CO2 emissions because it's not economically feasible to filter it;
America may need much less coal due to the fracking boom and other,
known or unknown technological alternatives and other reasons. What's
more important is that the stupid green brains don't know the answer at
all. These people exhibit a hardwired hardcore communist way of
thinking, or the lack of it."
No comments:
Post a Comment