Recently, a friend challenged
those assumptions. At first, I was annoyed, because I thought the
science really was settled. As I started to look at the data and read
about climate science, I was surprised, then shocked. As I learned more,
I changed my mind. I now think there probably is no climate crisis and
that the focus on CO2 takes funding and attention from critical
environmental problems. I’ll start by making ten short statements that
should challenge your assumptions and then back them up with an essay.
1 Weather is not climate. There are no studies showing a conclusive link between global warming and increased frequency or intensity of storms, droughts, floods, cold or heat waves.
2 Natural variation in weather and climate is tremendous. Most of what people call “global warming” is natural.
3 There is tremendous uncertainty as to how the climate really works. Climate models are not yet skillful; predictions are unresolved.
4 New
research shows that fluctuations in energy from the sun correlate very
strongly with changes in earth’s temperature, at both long and short
time scales.
5 CO2 has very little to do with it. All the decarbonization we can do isn’t going to change the climate much.
6 There is no such thing as “carbon pollution.”
Carbon dioxide is coming out of your nose right now; it is not a
poisonous gas. CO2 concentrations in previous eras have been many times
higher than they are today.
7 Sea level will probably continue to rise, naturally and slowly. Researchers have found no link between CO2 and sea level.
8 The Arctic experiences natural variation as well, with some years warmer earlier than others. Polar bear numbers are up, not down. They have more to do with hunting permits than CO2*.
9 No
one has shown any damage to reef or marine systems. Additional man-made
CO2 will not likely harm oceans, reef systems, or marine life. Fish are
mostly threatened by people who eat them.
10 The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others are pursuing a
political agenda and a PR campaign, not scientific inquiry. There’s a tremendous amount of trickery going on under the surface*.
Could this possibly be right? Is it heresy, or critical thinking — or both? If I’ve upset or confused you, let me guide you through my journey
You’ll find it at: www.climatecurious.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment