NALOPKT
Yesterday, we saw how easily debunked the original “97% of scientists agree” turned out to be.
There therefore had to be a renewed attempt by the warmist
establishment to make the claim stick, so step forward John Cook with a
much more sophisticated scam.
Jose Duarte,
expert in Social Psychology, Scientific Validity, and Research Methods,
has actually called the Cook paper “multiply fraudulent”, and, as far
as I know, Cook has taken no action to challenge the claim. This, as
much as anything else, shows just what a con trick the whole business
was. How many scientists, after all, would accept being called
fraudulent without taking action?
...............It is clear that. from the very start, Cook and his colleagues were
intent upon providing an eye-catching “consensus” which they could sell
to the media, and which would be picked up by politicians and others in
the establishment, regardless of what the evidence actually said.
The reality is starkly different. After searching through 12000
scientific papers, spread over 20 years, all they could only come up
with was 65 which supported the supposed consensus."
No comments:
Post a Comment