WUWT
The revelation by Dr. John Bates
that the “pause-busting” graph produced by NOAA was manipulated was no
surprise. It was just another piece of bespoke science produced to push
forward the AGW agenda and the Paris Climate Agreement. Bates used
strange terminology by saying the graph was “hyped” and based on
unverifiable, misleading, data. This is Orwellian Newspeak, for saying
it was deliberately falsified for a predetermined result. They cheated.
Bates is not a whistleblower because he waited until he retired to speak
out. It is likely he would still be silent if Hillary Clinton were
elected.
If he was such a good climate scientist, why didn’t he see the
corrupted science that was going on for most of his career? The answer
is a combination of he didn’t know much about climate, and it would
jeopardize his career and pension. I can’t repeat often enough German
meteorologist and physicists Klaus-Ekhart Puls experience.
“Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I
started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of
doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the
IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even
supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still
feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science
without first checking it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment