JoNova(Australia)
The evidence is overwhelming but the names of 85 unconvinced experts
threatens the Earth. Shield your eyes, sinner, lest ye faith be tested!
The Religion of Carbonoid-Weather-Control is so fragile, and
Wikipedia so captured by philosophical fruit flies, that 35 editors
voted down 19 other editors and now The List does not exist. Thus do 35
editors keep safe the minds of Wikipedia babes who might get confused
when they see Richard Lindzen and Roy Spencers names and mistake them
for actual climate scientists… oh.
.....
Dr Roger Higgs notes:
By the way, note three BBC-style
disingenuous omissions in the title alone: “List of scientists who
disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming”:
(1) these are not just any scientists, but well-known and, in many cases, distinguished scientists (Happer, Soon, Lindzen, etc, etc; see below), in diverse fields of science;
(2) they disagree with the consensus on man-made global warming (no educated person denies global warming; Earth has always alternately warmed and cooled);
(3) the consensus is only among climate scientists (whose salaries, research grants, and reputations depend on public belief in man-made warming).
Time to share far and wide. If Wikipedia is serious they have to kick out the editors with political or religious bias.
Dr Roger Higgs, by the way has published:
29 bullet points prove global warming by the sun, not CO2: by a GEOLOGIST for a change
No comments:
Post a Comment